SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Telangana) 41

T.AMARNATH GOUD
T. Satya Rajuvs – Appellant
Versus
Chairman and Managing Director – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :CH VENKAT RAMAN, Advocate
For the Respondent:J SRINIVASA RAO, Advocate

ORDER:

1. This writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondents in not changing the date of birth of the petitioner in his service record as per the Medical certificate, dated 15.07.2014 issued by the Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad, as illegal and arbitrary and further direct the respondents to pay the salary from 31.03.2017 till his legal superannuation date along with other statutory benefits as the petitioner is a deemed employee of the respondent company.

2. Heard Sri Ch.Venkat Raman, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri J.Sreenivasa Rao, learned standing counsel for Singareni Collieries - respondents 1 to 3.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that he joined in the service and worked as Tyndol in the 1st respondent company at Goutham Khani, Kothagudem, Khammam District and his brother is also working in the respondent company, who is five years elder than him, but in the company records his age is wrongly noted as 20.03.1957 instead of 03.07.1962. As per the Transfer Certificate and other educational certificates, the original date of birth of the petitioner is 03.07.1962. After noticing the mistake of date of birth as 20.03.1957, the petitioner made an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top