US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
J. SREENIVAS RAO
Polemoni Shankariah, S/o. P. Ramulu – Appellant
Versus
Proposed Fishermen Cooperative Society, Jalpally represented by its Chief Promoter, Polemoni Jangaiah S/o. Ramulu – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
Petitioners filed this application under Rule 16 (a) of the Writ Rules, 1977 (hereinafter called as 'the Rules' for brevity) seeking permission to implead them as petitioner Nos.2 to 37 in W.P. No.3420 of 2020 as well as in I.A. Nos.1 of 2020 and 2 of 2020.
2. Petitioners submit that Proposed Fishermen Cooperative Society, Jalapally, Balapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (writ petitioner) represented by Chief Promoter, Polemoni Jangaiah, filed the above Writ Petition No.3420 of 2020 questioning the action of the respondent Nos.1 to 4 in not according permission for formation / registration of Fishermen Cooperative Society, Jalapally, Balapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
2.1 In the said writ petition, respondent No.5/Society impleaded as party/ respondent as per the orders in I.A. No.2 of 2020, dated 06.01.2023 and respondent No.5 raised an objection that the petitioner is not a juristic person and the writ petition filed by the petitioner is not maintainable.
2.2 The petitioners submit that to avoid the technical objection raised by the respondent No.5, they filed the
Point of Law : It will not be open for plaintiffs to contend that no decree in counter-claim be passed in absence of subsequent purchasers - Therefore, non-impleading the subsequent purchasers as def....
The court emphasized the necessity of including all parties with direct interest in a suit for comprehensive adjudication, rejecting the exclusion based solely on prior dismissals.
The court held that only two or more natural persons may file for leave under Section 92 CPC, prohibiting unincorporated associations from seeking such leave, affirming the specific provisions over g....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article