SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1939 Supreme(Nagpur) 77

STONE
PUNJARAM JAGOBA TELI – Appellant
Versus
RAMU CHINTOO GOND – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Stone, C J—I have had the advantage of reading the opinions of my colleagues. We are agreed as to the answer. That is to say I concur in the opinion that the answer to the question referred is in the negative. As there is disagreement as to reasons I consider it preferable to reserve my conclusions on the matters in difference until those matters are directly in issue. To do otherwise would, I feel, not be useful as the opinion expressed would be obiter merely. I have already as a member of a Division Bench in Daryaosingh v. Col Krisimarao Kukde,1939 AIR(Nag) 91 indicated that as regards absolute occupancy tenancies the tenancy is of a special kind--it is a tenancy which springs out of settlement and statute. Doubtless occupancy tenancies are more akin to the tenancies known to English law, but again there are manifest differences which I do not consider it necessary to review here for the reason above indicated. The case will now go back to the referring Judge for disposal in the light of the answer given to the question referred.

2. I have had the advantage of perusing the able and elaborate opinion delivered by my learned brother Bose J. His answer to the question referre


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top