KOLHATKAR
MAHADEO – Appellant
Versus
GANESHRAM – Respondent
Kolhatkar, A J C—It is expedient to set out the following genealogical table explaining the relationship of the parties to the suit for partition giving rise to this appeal.
Madhoji (died in 1916) | ----------------- | | Ramji Krishnaji Deft. 1 wife Yashoda deft. 9 | ---------------------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | Mahadeo Daulat Shamrao Balwantrao Nana Gulab Ajab deft. 6 by the died in (Plff. 1) (deft. 2) (deft. 3) (defts. 4 and 5) | 1898(by | (first wife) the first Bhaorao minor | wife (plff. 2) Janrao deft. 8
2. The only subject-matter of this second appeal consists of two fields cos. 1/1 and 13/1, situated in the village Mahimapur in Chandur Taluq. These two fields are in possession of defendant 6, Mahadeo, the step brother of plaintiff 1 and defendants 2, 3, 4 and 5, and they are mortgaged by him to defendant 12, Ganeshram. Defendant 6, Mahadeo, claimed the two fields as his self-acquired property. It seems that some time after the death of the mother of defendant 6, Mahadeo and his real brother Daulat, his grand-father Madhoji executed a will on 7th June 1897, whereby he bequeathed the aforesaid two fields to his two motherless grandsons, Mahadeo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.