1. In Civil Suit No. 23 of 1919 in the Court of the Additional District Judge, Nagpur, the appellant Mt. Dhannabai sued the respondent Keshrichand and one Manmal, now represented by his widow Manabai, for partnership accounts and for the recovery of certain profits as well for division, by metes and bounds, and possession of the plaintiff's alleged share in the immovable property concerned, as well as for the recovery of ornaments specified in Schedule G. After the case had reached the evidence stage, a compromise was arrived at; the terms of the compromise are on record. Under it, the present appellant was held to be entitled to a three annas share, defendant 1 to a seven anna share and defendant 2 to six anna, share. It was further agreed, that defendant 1 should transact all the business of the firm, balance the accounts and render them when asked, other terms as to the amount of money, the plaintiff and defendant 2 might spend for the construction of a temple and of a bungalow, were also included, as well as various miscellaneous matters which it is unnecessary to specify here The decree passed in the case by the Additional District Judge cannot be described as a peculi