SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1926 Supreme(Nagpur) 68

KINKHEDE
PANNALAL – Appellant
Versus
RAJARAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M B Niyogi, V N Bapat, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Kinkhede—This judgment will also govern Second Appeal No. 71-B of 1925. One Barkya and his brother Khondya owned Survey No. 82 of mouza Asegaon. They both mortgaged it on 8-1 12 to one Satuji. Barkya alone mortgaged his half-share in it to the plaintiff-appellant Pannalal on 15-4-16 with a condition for foreclosure. Barkya made default in payment and Pannalal therefore sued him for foreclosure and obtained a final decree for foreclosure on 11-12-19. Barkya was the sole defendant in the case. A few months before the date of the mortgage suit Barkya and Khondya granted a lease of the entire field for a term of seven years by a registered deed dated 24-6-18, Exhibit D-1, to one Amrit Narayan (D.W.3) and put him in possession of the field. The mortgagee Pannalal did not join the lessee as a party to the mortgage suit. In pursuance of the final decree for foreclosure the plaintiff took formal possession of his mortgagor's share through Court on 11-2-20, Exhibit P-4; the actual possession however remained with the lessee.

2. The prior mortgagee Satuji, who is the father of the present respondent Rajaram entered into a transaction with his mortgagors Barkya and Khondya evidenced by
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top