KINKHEDE
PANNALAL – Appellant
Versus
RAJARAM – Respondent
Kinkhede—This judgment will also govern Second Appeal No. 71-B of 1925. One Barkya and his brother Khondya owned Survey No. 82 of mouza Asegaon. They both mortgaged it on 8-1 12 to one Satuji. Barkya alone mortgaged his half-share in it to the plaintiff-appellant Pannalal on 15-4-16 with a condition for foreclosure. Barkya made default in payment and Pannalal therefore sued him for foreclosure and obtained a final decree for foreclosure on 11-12-19. Barkya was the sole defendant in the case. A few months before the date of the mortgage suit Barkya and Khondya granted a lease of the entire field for a term of seven years by a registered deed dated 24-6-18, Exhibit D-1, to one Amrit Narayan (D.W.3) and put him in possession of the field. The mortgagee Pannalal did not join the lessee as a party to the mortgage suit. In pursuance of the final decree for foreclosure the plaintiff took formal possession of his mortgagor's share through Court on 11-2-20, Exhibit P-4; the actual possession however remained with the lessee.
2. The prior mortgagee Satuji, who is the father of the present respondent Rajaram entered into a transaction with his mortgagors Barkya and Khondya evidenced by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.