SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1924 Supreme(Nagpur) 5

KINKHEDE
BHAGIRATHIBAI – Appellant
Versus
EMPEROR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G P Dick, R B Jayavant, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Kinkhede—The petitioner Bhagirathi is an illiterate Kunbi woman aged 30 years and resident of mouza Dhanora. She has a minor son by name Gulab. On 17-3-1922 when her father who used to adivse her in her affairs was absent she was approached by: (1) Punjaji (who owned field Survey No. 16 sub-division called 'thadicha' of mouza Dhanora); (2) Ganpati Kunbi; (3) Maroti Teli; and (4) Govind Sonar, with a proposal that she should purchase the field for her minor son. That when she was pressed by them to purchase the same, she, acting on the assurance of the latter three persons, agreed to purchase it for Rs. 3,000 and paid Rs. 803 as earnest money immediately. She also paid Rs. 158 in satisfaction of a mortgage debt due by Punjaji to Ganpat and promised to pay Rs. 2,037 at the time of registration the next day. Accordingly the sale deed was written and registered on 18-3-1922. It was recited therein that the property was put into the vendees possession that day. The consideration was thus duly paid and the document was duly attested by Maroti and Govind. That about 2 or 3 weeks thereafter, Bhagirathi sent her servants with ploughs to cultivate the land but they were wrongfully ob

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top