SEN, BHUTT
SHALIGRAM BINDALAL – Appellant
Versus
PUNDALIK BALIRAM – Respondent
1. This revision is directed against the order allowing an application of non-applicant No. 1 Pundlik to set aside an 'ex parte' decree.
2. The applicant filed civil suit No. 102-A of 1949 in the Court of the Civil Judge, Class II, Khamgaon, on 20-6-1949 for recovery of Rs. 400/- due on a deed of conditional sale, dated 18-6-1946, that was executed by Tulsiram, the predecessor-in-interest of non-applicants Nos. 2 and 3, in his favour. The consideration of the transfer was Rs. 300/- which was said to be taken for legal necessity and payment of antecedent debts. Under the document Tulsiram ostensibly sold southern I acre 11 gunthas of survey No. 40/IA of mouza Machhindrakhed, taluq Khamgaon, on condition that on payment of the consideration within two years the applicant would reconvey the property to him. The transaction was treated as a mortgage by conditional sale as defined in S. 58(c), Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and a preliminary decree for foreclosure was passed on 7-3-1950 for a sum of Rs. 465/4/- inclusive of costs.
3. The applicant filed an application on 8-9-1950 for making the decree final. Doting the pendency of this application, he put to sale the mortgaged pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.