DEO, MANGALMURTI, MUDHOLKAR
BADRIBISHAL BHAGULAL GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
MISHRILAL KARNIDAN OSWAL – Respondent
Mudholkar, J—This is an application for revision of an order passed in execution of a decree of a Court of Small Causes against the Applicant as surety of the judgment-debtor Ramlal who is non-Applicant No. 2 to this application.
2. The non-Applicant No. 1 sued the non-Applicant No. 2 for recovery of a sum of Rs. 160/-. The non-Applicant No. 1 filed an application on the 31st August 1946 under Order XXXVIII, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure alleging that the non-Applicant No. 2 was disposing of his property and was about to leave the local limits of the jurisdiction of the Court with intent to obstruct realisation of the claim of the non-Applicant No. 1, if decreed, and prayed for the issue of a warrant of arrest of the non-Applicant No. 2. The Court granted the application and directed the issue of a warrant of arrest for the production of the non-Applicant No. 2 in Court to show cause why he should not furnish security for appearance. The Order also provided that if the non-Applicant N. 2 deposited the amount he may not be arrested. In the warrant a note appears to have been added providing an option to the non-Applicant No. 2 either to de' posit Rs. 160/- in cash or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.