SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1948 Supreme(Nagpur) 86

VIVIAN BOSE, MUDHOLKAR
WARISKHAN – Appellant
Versus
AHMADULLAKHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K G Chendke, M R Bobde, P R Padhye, R J Bhave, R S Dabir, T L Shevde, V R Sen, Advocates

JUDGMENT

1. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Mudholkar J.--This judgment will govern the decisions of First Appeal no. 74 of 1940 and Second Appeal no. 108 of 1940 also.

2. This appeal and First Appeal no. 74 of 1940 arise out of Civil Suit no. 29-A of 1936, on the file of the Second Subordinate Judge, First Class, Jubbulpore, while Second Appeal no. 108 of 1940 arises out of Civil Suit no. 180-A of 1938, on the file of the Second Subordinate Judge, Second Class, Jubbulpore. In Civil Suit no. 29-A of 1936 the plaintiffs-respondents claim partition and separate possession of a 7/36th share in five houses in Jubbulpore nos. 74, 447, 458, 468 and 631, and also mesne profits for three years amounting to Rs. 2,034 plus interest thereon at 1 per cent, i.e., Rs. 393-4-0, in all amounting to Rs. 2,427-4-0. They claim to have purchased this share from one Amir Khan, the step-brother of appellants 1 to 3 and the step-son of appellant no. 4. In Civil Suit no. 180-A of 1938 one of the appellants claims rent for a portion of house no. 458 from the plaintiffs-respondents and their ejectment there from.

3. It is admitted that the property in suit and a house at Bhopal were the property of




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top