SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1945 Supreme(Nagpur) 60

POLLOCK, SEN
SAMSHER KHAN – Appellant
Versus
VITHALDAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M R Bobde, R N Padhye, T L Shevde, V V Kelkar, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Pollock, J—On the 14th October 1935 the defendant Samsher Khan, who is the appellant in this Court, executed a document (Exhibit P-2) in favour of Champalal, the predecessor in title of the plaintiffs-respondents, by which he purported to sell outright to Champalal certain fields for Rs. 3,200. On the following day Samsher Khan executed a kabuliyat (Exhibit P-3) in favour of Champalal by which he agreed to take these fields for eight years on an annual rent of Rs. 145, and Champalal executed an agreement (Exhibit D-1) in favour of Samsher Khan by which he agreed to reconvey the fields to Samsher Khan if Samsher Khan paid within eight years Rs. 3,200, the consideration for the sale, and Rs. 1,160 representing eight years' rent. All three documents were registered simultaneously on the 15th October. The question in dispute is whether the transaction was a mortgage by conditional sale, as defined in section 58 (c) of the Transfer of Property Act, or whether it was, as it appears to be on the face of it, an out and out sale, and the sole point argued before us was whether the question is concluded by the proviso to section 58 (c).

2. That proviso runs as follows :

Provided that n









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top