SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Lah) 1

Commissioner of Income-Tax, Punjab And N W F Provinces – Appellant
Versus
E V H Miller – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. These four references involve a common question of law, namely, whether the dividends distributed by a company to its shareholders out of agricultural income can themselves be treated as agricultural income within the meaning of the Income-tax Act. It is admitted that the only income which the companies have is agricultural income within the meaning of the companies have is agricultural income and that, as such, it is exempt from tax in the hands of the companies themselves.

2. Upon a reading of the relevant provisions of the Act, we should have had no difficulty in returning an affirmative answer. But two recent decisions of Indian High Courts and one of the Supreme Court of India, to the contrary, have given us considerable food for thought; and having examined them again and again. We have ventured to differ from them. We had to be very clear in our mind before we could differ from decisions of such weight and authority, and at the very outset I should state that I am clear about two matters. Firstly, in emphasizing the distinction between the company and its shareholders, the Indian Courts have been carried away more by the outward form than by the substance of the di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top