THOMAS
Jagannath – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Thomas, CJ - Jagannath alias Khairati, Sri Ram and Jamil Khan have been convicted by the learned Sessions Judge of Lucknow under Section 392, Penal Code, for committing a robbery on the high way, and sentenced to six years' rigorous imprisonment each. The trial was by jury and the jury by a majority of 3 to 2 found all the accused guilty, and the learned Sessions Judge accepted that verdict. In this Court the three accused have been represented -by three different counsel. Jagannath has been represented by Mr. A.N. Mulla, Sri Ram by Mr. Bahadurji and Jamil Khan by Mr. Siraj Husain. I find from the record that Mr. A.N. Mulla represented the accused Sri Ram and Jagannath in the Court of Session and accused 3 Jamil Khan was represented by a different counsel, (Mr. Partab Narain Sexena). Lengthy arguments have been advanced by the learned Counsel before me to show that there has been a misdirection to the jury and therefore the trial is vitiated. Under Section 418(1), Criminal P.C., an appeal may lie on a matter of fact as well as a matter of law except where the trial was by jury, in which ease the appeal shall lie on a matter of law only.
2. The facts of the case are that on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.