CARR
(Shakoor) Abdul Ganny – Appellant
Versus
Mrs I M Russell – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Carr, J - This is an application under Rule 9(2), Appellate Side Rules of Procedure of this Court to restore to the file an appeal struck off under Rule 9(1) for default of payment of process fees.
2. The application was not made within the eight days allowed by Sub-rule (2) and if that rule is intra vires I am in my opinion precluded from considering the application. But it is contended that, in so far as it prescribes a time limit different from that provided in Article 168, Lim. Act, the rule is ultra vires.
3. I think that this contention deserves consideration. The power given to this Court by Section 122, Civil P.C., by the Letters Patent and by Section 108, Government of India Act, is merely the power to regulate its procedure by rules and orders: Ma Than v. Mg Ba Gyaw A.I.R. 1926 Rang. 1. Rule 9(1) is in my view within that power, since whether an appeal is struck off by the Deputy Registrar for default of payment of process fees, or has to be laid before a Judge to be struck off is merely a matter of procedure. But Art 168, Limitation Act, allows an appellant whoso appeal has been dismissed for want of prosecution 30 days within which to apply for its re-admission. D
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.