CARR
U Tun Hlaing – Appellant
Versus
Maung Sein Aye – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Carr, J - Stripped of non-essentials the facts of this case are as follows: Ko Thaw is the husband of Ma Kale Ma, deceased, and defendant-respondent 2 is her daughter by a prior marriage.
2. In Suit No. 17 of 1928 of the Sub-divisional Court of Kyauktan a Chettyar firm obtained a decree against Ko Thaw as the legal representative of Ma Kale Ma, and against him personally. In Civil Execution No. 98 of 1928 of the same Court, a holding of paddy land measuring 70.01 acres was attached. In Civil Misc. No. 13 of 1929 of the same Court, Ma Ngwe Myaing and her brother Maung Soe Win applied for removal of the attachment, claiming to be owners of the land in their own right, and not as heirs of their mother Ma Kale Ma. They obtained, on 27th May 1929, an order removing the attachment on one-half interest in the land, which was found to belong to them.
3. But in four other suits in the District Court of Hanthawaddy creditors had obtained decrees against Ko Thaw and Maung Soe Win both personally and as legal representatives of Ma Kale Ma and against Ma Ngwe Myaing as legal representative of Ma Kaie Ma. In proceedings in execution of each of these decrees the same land was attached, no o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.