Present:
Justice Fatema Najib Civil Revision No. 466 of 2021
Md. Asaduzzaman and others
................…petitioners
-Versus-
Md. Kamruzzaman and others
................Opposite Parties Mr. Pronay Kanti Roy, Advocate
....... For the petitioners
Mr. Sanjoy Mondal, Advocate
..….For the opposite parties
Heard on 16.01.2024
Judgment on: 28.01.2024
This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos. 1-13 to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order dated 20.11.2020 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, 1st Court, Pirojpur in Chani Case No. 18 of 2020 arising out of Title Appeal No. 24 of 2018 allowing the application under Order XLI Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure should not be set aside and/ or such other or further order or orders passed as to this court may seem fit and proper.
Pending hearing of the Rule, the operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 20.11.2020 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, 1st Court, Pirojpur in Chani Case No. 18 of 2020 arising out of Title Appeal No. 24 of 2018 allowing the application under Order 41 Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure was stayed for a period of 06(six) months from date.
1
The peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.