SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 14137

Present:

Justice Fatema Najib Civil Revision No. 466 of 2021

Md. Asaduzzaman and others

................…petitioners

-Versus-

Md. Kamruzzaman and others

................Opposite Parties Mr. Pronay Kanti Roy, Advocate

....... For the petitioners

Mr. Sanjoy Mondal, Advocate

..….For the opposite parties

Heard on 16.01.2024

Judgment on: 28.01.2024

This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos. 1-13 to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order dated 20.11.2020 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, 1st Court, Pirojpur in Chani Case No. 18 of 2020 arising out of Title Appeal No. 24 of 2018 allowing the application under Order XLI Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure should not be set aside and/ or such other or further order or orders passed as to this court may seem fit and proper.

Pending hearing of the Rule, the operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 20.11.2020 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, 1st Court, Pirojpur in Chani Case No. 18 of 2020 arising out of Title Appeal No. 24 of 2018 allowing the application under Order 41 Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure was stayed for a period of 06(six) months from date.


1

The peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top