SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 12656

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION

(CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION)

Present:

Mr. Justice S M Kuddus Zaman

CIVIL REVISION NO.233 of 2002. In the matter of:

An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

And

Most. Nahida Akter and another ...Petitioners

-Versus-

Jahera Khatun and others

...opposite parties

Mr. Md. Zakaria, Advocate

...For the petitioners No one appears

...For the opposite parties

Heard & Judgment on 24.10.2024.

This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos.1-2 to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree of reversal dated 30.09.2001 passed by the learned District Judge, Brahmanbaria in Family Court Appeal No.7 of 2001 should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.

Facts in short are that the petitioners as plaintiffs instituted Family Suit No.63 of 2000 for recovery of dower of plaintiff No.1 and dower and maintenance for both the plaintiffs No.1-2 a


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top