SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 12063

Bench:

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty

Civil Revision No. 3118 of 2017

Md. Hemayet Uddin ..... petitioner

-Versus-

Md. Mosharaf Hossain (Nanu Mia) and others

..... opposite parties

Mr. Sherder Abul Hossain with

Mr. Md. Ismail Hossain, Advocates

..... for the petitioner

Mr. Muhammad Ashraf Ali with

Mr. Md. Shahadat Alam, Advocates

..... for the opposite parties

Judgment on 29.07.2024

This rule at the instance of defendant 1 was issued calling upon the plaintiff opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Court No. 2, Bagerhat passed on 13.06.2017 in Title Appeal No. 64 of 2011 dismissing the appeal affirming the judgment and decree of the Assistant Judge, Chitalmari, Bagerhat passed on 29.03.2011 in Title Suit No. 55 of 2002 decreeing the suit should not set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this Court may seem fit and proper .

The plaint case, in brief, is that land measuring .05 acres of SA khatian 29 and .02 acres of SA khatian 136 of Fulmoni mouja was owned, held and possessed by Makbular Mir. He died leaving behind 4 sons and 2 daughters and consequently each of the son got .014


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top