Bench:

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty

Civil Revision No. 4513 of 2016

Razia Khatun and others

......petitioners -Versus-

Md. Khokon Kha and others

......opposite parties

Mr. Md. Shah Alam Sarker, Advocate

...... for the petitioners

Mr. Golam Ahmed Bulbul, Advocate

...... for opposite parties 1-12

Judgment on 14.07.2024

At the instance of defendants 4(Ka)-4(Jha) this Rule was issued calling upon the plaintiff-opposite parties 1-12 to show cause as to why the judgment and order of the District Judge, Chandpur passed on 03.11.2016 in Title Appeal No.74 of 2016 dismissing the appeal summarily affirming the final decree drawn up on 19.01.2012 by the Senior Assistant Judge, Sadar, Chandpur in Title Suit No.75 of 1965 decreeing the suit on compromise should not be set aside and and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this court may seem fit and proper.

Facts relevant for disposal of the Rule, in brief, are that opposite parties 1-4 herein as plaintiffs instituted the aforesaid suit against the petitioners and others praying for partition of the suit land as described in the schedule to the plaint claiming saham to the extent of 2.32 acres. The p