Bench:

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty

Civil Revision No. 4109 of 2007

Asad Miah and others ..... petitioners -Versus-

Altab Ali being dead his heirs Latita Banu and

others ..... opposite parties

Mr. Mohiuddin Ahmed, Advocate

..... for the petitioners

Mr. Abida Gulrukh, Advocate

..... for opposite party1

Judgment on 25.04.2024

In this rule opposite parties 1(Ka)-1(Yeo) were called upon to show cause as to why the judgment and decree of the Joint District Judge, Court No. 2, Kishoreganj passed on 20.03.2007 in Title Appeal No. 155 of 1996 dismissing the appeal affirming the judgment and decree of the Senior Assistant Judge, Bajitpur, Kishoreganj passed on 22.06.1996 in Title Suit No. 27 of 1995 decreeing the suit should not set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this Court may seem fit and proper .

Facts relevant for disposal of the Rule, in brief, are that the plaintiff instituted the suit in the aforesaid Court alleging, inter alia, that Pir Box and Mir Box were the CS recorded owners of the suit land. They had equal shares but erroneously the share of Pir Box was recorded as 4 annas 13 gandas 1 kara and 1 kranti instead of 5 annas 13 gandas 1 ka