SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 14023

Bench:

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty

Civil Revision No. 1062 of 2005

Md. Joydhar Ali and others ..... petitioners -Versus-

Mossamat Karam Jan Bibi and others

..... opposite parties No one appears for either party

Judgment on 15.02.2024

Bhishmadev Chakrabortty, J:

At the instance of the plaintiffs this rule was issued and the opposite parties were called upon to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 22.02.2005 passed by the Special District Judge, Dhaka in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 102 of 2004 dismissing the appeal and thereby affirming the judgment and order dated 07.04.2004 passed by the Assistant Judge, Dohar, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 37 of 2003 rejecting the application for temporary injunction should not be set aside and and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this Court may seem fit and proper.

At the time of issuing the rule, the parties were directed to maintain status quo in respect of the possession of the suit land for a limited period. Subsequently, the aforesaid order has been extended till disposal of the rule.

Facts relevant for disposal of the rule, in brief, are that the plaintiffs brought the suit praying for permanent injunction


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top