Bench:

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty

Civil Revision No. 3044 of 2005

Md. A Barek ..... petitioner -Versus-

Md. Chan Miah and others

..... opposite parties

Mr. Md. Abdul Barek Chowdhury with

Mr. Nowaj Sharif, Advocates

..... for the petitioner

Mr. Abdul Hai Sarkar, Advocate

..... for the opposite parties 3-6,8-13

Judgment on 20.05.2024

At the instance of defendant 22 this rule was issued calling upon the plaintiff-opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and decree of the Joint District Judge, Court No. 1, Pirojpur passed on 11.01.2005 in Title Appeal No. 102 of 1999 allowing the appeal reversing the judgment and decree of the Assistant Judge, Mathbaria, Pirojpur passed on 21.07.1999 in Title Suit No. 190 of 1994 dismissing the suit should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this Court may seem fit and proper.

The plaint case, in brief, is that Nazar Ali Khalifa and others were the karsh tenant under Tamizuddin Mridha through a amalnama. Nazar Ali died leaving behind his wife Zarina Khatun, sons Abdul Mazid, Abdus Sattar and Abdul Aziz and a daughter Nurnnessa as heirs. The above heirs became the owners and

possessors of