SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 15078

Present:

Mr. Justice A.K.M. Asaduzzaman

Civil Revision No.1143 of 2019

Shamsun Nahar and others.

……………Petitioners.

-Versus-

Lil Chand and others.

………….Opposite parties.

Mr.Mohammad Aminul Islam, Adv.

……….For the petitioners.

Mr. Md. Shariful Islam, Adv.

.........For the Opposite parties.

Heard and Judgment on 28.02.2024. A.K.M.Asaduzzaman,J.

This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to

show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 13.03.2019 passed by the District Judge, Rajshahi in Title Appeal No. 231 of 2011 reversing those dated 16.05.2011 passed by the Assistant Judge, Puthia, Rajshahi in Other Class Suit No. 16 of 1996 dismissing the suit should not be set aside.

Opposite party as plaintiff filed Other Class Suit No. 16 of 1996 before the Court of Assistant Judge, Puthia, Rajshahi against the petitioners for declaration of title in the suit land in respect of 0.48 acres of land in schedule no. 1 and 0.98 acres of land in schedule no. 2.


1

Plaint case in short inter alia is that suit land was belonged to Govor Sardar, the grandfather of the plaintiff in respect of 2.56 acres, recorded in C.S. khatian no. 203 at Jama Rs. 8 anna 5 under the Superi


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top