SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 13928

Present:

Mr. Justice A.K.M. Asaduzzaman

Civil Revision No.2065 of 2023

Mossammaunt Momotaz Begum and others.

……………Petitioners.

-Versus-

Md. Badol Hossain Dewan and others.

………….Opposite parties.

Mr. Md. Alamgir Mostafizur Rahman, Adv.

……….For the petitioners.

Mr. Md. Rafiqul Hossain Miah, Adv.

.........For the Opposite parties. Heard and Judgment on 18.03.2024. A.K.M.Asaduzzaman,J.

This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party nos. 1-

13 to show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 23.03.2023 passed by the Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Munshigonj in Title Appeal No. 230 of 2015 affirming those dated 29.10.2015 passed by the Assistant Judge, Gazaria, Munshigonj in Title Suit No. 96 of 2009 (Civil Suit No. 96 of 2009) decreed the suit should not be set aside.


1

Opposite party nos. 1-13 as plaintiffs filed the suit for rectification of deed against petitioner before the Court of Assistant Judge, Gazaria, Munshigonj.

Plaint case in short inter alia, is that suit land was of CS khatian No. 232,


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top