SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 14545

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH

HIGH COURT DIVISION

(CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION)

Civil Revision No. 3200 of 2014

IN THE MATTER OF

Ranjit Bikash Chowdhury

........Defendant-Opposite party-Petitioner

-Versus-

Salil Majumder and another

......Plaintiffs-Petitioners-Opposite parties

Mr. Surojit Bhattacharjee with

Mr. Monisankar Sarker, Advocates

.……For the petitioner Mr. Md. Mubarak Hossain, Advocate

....….For the opposite parties

Heard on 13.06.23, 21.06.23, 11.07.23, 26.07.23, 24.01.24, 28.01.24, 29.01.24 and judgment passed on 06.02.2024

Present:

Mr. Justice Kazi Md. Ejarul Haque Akondo

Kazi Md. Ejarul Haque Akondo, J.

This Rule, under section 115(4) of the Code of Civil

Procedure, 1908, was issued in the following term-

“Records need not be called for and a Rule be issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order complained of in the petition moved in court today should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.”

At the time of issuance of the Rule, all further proceedings of Other Suit No. 2 of 2012 of the Court of Learned Assistant Judge, Boalkhali, Pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top