SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 8555

Bench:

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty

Civil Revision No.4721 of 2006

Md. Abul Kashem Ali ......petitioner -Versus-

Md. Surutzzamal being dead his heirs:

1(a) Mst. Rahima Begum and others

...... opposite parties

Mr. Abul Kashem Sarker, Advocate

...... for the petitioner

Mr. SK Sharifuddin, Advocate

...... for opposite party 1

Judgment on 21.05.2024

This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Kurigram passed on 05.04.2006 in Other Class Appeal No.79 of 2004 dismissing the appeal affirming the judgment and decree of the Senior Assistant Judge, Roumari, Kurigram passed on 07.09.2004 in Other Class Suit No.32 of 2003 dismissing the suit should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this Court may seem fit and proper.

The plaintiff brought the suit praying for permanent injunction against the defendants in respect of the suit land as described in the schedule to the plaint. In the plaint the plaintiff claimed that his mother Mst. Nesavan Bibi took 2.66 acres of the suit land pattan from the recorded owner Bakku Barman and Ram Narayan Barman in 1355 BS.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top