Bench:
Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty
Civil Revision No.4721 of 2006
Md. Abul Kashem Ali ......petitioner -Versus-
Md. Surutzzamal being dead his heirs:
1(a) Mst. Rahima Begum and others
...... opposite parties
Mr. Abul Kashem Sarker, Advocate
...... for the petitioner
Mr. SK Sharifuddin, Advocate
...... for opposite party 1
Judgment on 21.05.2024
This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Kurigram passed on 05.04.2006 in Other Class Appeal No.79 of 2004 dismissing the appeal affirming the judgment and decree of the Senior Assistant Judge, Roumari, Kurigram passed on 07.09.2004 in Other Class Suit No.32 of 2003 dismissing the suit should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this Court may seem fit and proper.
The plaintiff brought the suit praying for permanent injunction against the defendants in respect of the suit land as described in the schedule to the plaint. In the plaint the plaintiff claimed that his mother Mst. Nesavan Bibi took 2.66 acres of the suit land pattan from the recorded owner Bakku Barman and Ram Narayan Barman in 1355 BS.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.