SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 14660

1

Present:-

Mr. Justice Mahmudul Hoque

Civil Revision No. 3292 of 2015

Md. Mostafijar Rahman @ Md. Mostafizur Rahman

... Petitioner -Versus-

Md. Nur Mohammad Mandal and others

...Opposite-parties Mr. Bivash Chandra Biswas with

Ms. Shebani Biswas, Advocates

...For the petitioner Mr. Hosneara Begum, Advocate

...For the opposite-party No. 9.

Heard on 11.06.2024 and Judgment on 12th June, 2024.

In this application under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos. 1-9 to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order dated 13.08.2015 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 3rd Court, Bogura in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 118 of 2013 disallowing the same and thereby affirming the judgment and order dated 18.08.2013 passed by the learned Artha Rin Adalat, Bogura in Artha Rin Execution Case No. 160 of 2001 allowing an application under Order 21 Rule 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further orde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top