SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 13249

Present:

Mr. Justice A.K.M. Asaduzzaman

Civil Revision No. 2216 of 2022

Ali Ahmed @ Ali Mia being dead his legal heirs Md. Tazul Islam

………… Petitioner. -Versus-

Tayab Ali alias Abed Ali being dead his legal heirs 1 (a) Mst. Taslima Begum being dead her legal heirs and others

……….Opposite parties.

Mr. Shibli Nomani, Advocate

………For the petitioner.

Mr. Rafi Ahmed, Advocate with

Mr. Iftekhar Rahman, Advocate

.........For the Opposite parties

Heard and judgment on 4th June, 2024. A.K.M.Asaduzzaman,J.

This rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 22.06.2017


1

passed by the Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Dhaka in Title Appeal No. 136 of 2004 affirming those dated 31.3.2004 passed by the Joint District Judge, 2nd Court, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 330 of 2000 dismissing the suit should not be set aside.

Petitioner as plaintiff filed Title Suit No. 330 of 2000 before the Court of Joint District Judge, 2nd Court, Dhaka for declaration of title in respect of the suit land against the opposite parties.

Plaint case in short, inter alia, is that the suit land originally belonged to Sheikh Buddu and accordingly C.S.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top