SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 8586

Bench:

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty

Civil Revision No. 4631 of 2001

Eraton Bibi being dead her heirs:

1(a) Md. Nazmul Islam Mridha and others

.....petitioners -Versus-

Mazibar Rahman Talukder being dead his heirs: 1(a) Shahanara Begum and others

......opposite parties

Ms. Chowdhury Nasima, Advocate

...... for the petitioners

Mr. Kamruzzaman Bhuiyan with

Mr. Md. Moniruzzaman, Advocates

...... for opposite parties 1 and 2

Judgment on 06.05.2024

At the instance of the plaintiff this Rule was issued calling upon defendant-opposite parties 1 and 2 to show cause as to why the judgment and decree of the then Subordinate Judge, Court No.1, Patuakhali passed on 25.07.2001 in Title Appeal No.166 of 1999 allowing the appeal reversing the judgment and decree of the Assistant Judge, Kalapara, Patuakhali passed on 27.07.1999 in Title Suit No.29 of 1994 decreeing the suit should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this court may seem fit and proper.

The plaint case, in brief, is that Amzad Hossain Talukder was the recorded tenant of RS khatian 106 comprising 6 plots measuring an area of 8.93 acres. During his possession and enjoyment he transferr


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top