Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Iqbal Kabir

And

Mr. Justice Md. Riaz Uddin Khan

01.08.2024

Mr. Md. Bodruddoza, Advocate with

….For the Petitioner

Mr. Md. Manirul Islam, Advocate

....For the respondent No. 2

At the midst of the hearing, the learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that he has received instruction from his client not to proceed with the Rule. According to him, the Rule may be discharged for non-prosecution.

In the light of the above, the Rule is discharged for non-prosecution.

The interim order granted at the time of issuance of the Rule is hereby recalled and vacated.

However, at the time of the hearing, the learned Advocate for the respondent No. 2 Bank brought notice to this Court that the petitioner challenged the legality of the order dated 23.02.2023 based on which the Rule was issued and an interim order has passed. According to him petitioner annexed a manipulated/improper certified copy of the order No. 9 dated 23-02-2023 (Annexure-B and C) to the petition.

He brought to notice to this Court that respondent No. 2 filed an affidavit-in- opposition along with a certified photocopy of the