Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Iqbal Kabir

And

Mr. Justice Md. Riaz Uddin Khan

01.08.2024

Mr. Md. Bodruddoza, Advocate with

….For the Petitioner

Mr. Md. Manirul Islam, Advocate

....For the respondent No. 2

At the midst of the hearing, the learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that he has received instruction from his client not to proceed with the Rule. According to him, the Rule may be discharged for non-prosecution.

In the light of the above, the Rule is discharged for non-prosecution.

The interim order granted at the time of issuance of the Rule is hereby recalled and vacated.

However, at the time of the hearing, the learned Advocate for the respondent No. 2 Bank brought notice to this Court that the petitioner challenged the legality of the order dated 23.02.2023 based on which the Rule was issued and an interim order has passed. According to him petitioner annexed a manipulated/improper certified copy of the order No. 9 dated 23-02-2023 (Annexure-B and C) to the petition.

He brought to notice to this Court that respondent No. 2 filed an affidavit-in- opposition along with a certified photocopy of the order No. 9 dated 23.02.2023 showing such order, respondent claimed that the petitioner annexed a manipulated/ improper certified copy of the order No. 9 dated 23.02.2023 and relying upon the manipulated document took ground.

According to him the order annexed by the petitioner is a manipulated one and the order annexed by respondent No. 2 in the affidavit-in-opposition is the genuine one.

For our better understanding, the order No. 09 dated 23-02-2023 passed in Artha Rin Case No. 260 of 2022 (Annexure- B and C) is hereby reproducing below:

B−cn ew-09, a¡¢lM-23/02/2023 x-

AcÉ 2000/- V¡L¡ Cost pq ¢hh¡c£f−r ¢m¢Ma

Sh¡h c¡¢M−ml SeÉ ¢ce d¡kÑÉ B−Rz h¡c£f−r q¡¢Sl¡ pq j¡jm¡l pjbÑ−e ¢g¢l¢Ù¹ ®k¡−N j¤m L¡NSfœ c¡¢M−ml SeÉ pj−ul B−hce L−lz ¢g¢l¢Ù¹ ®k¡−N Q¡m¡e ew-745, a¡w- 22/2/23 q~w j¤−m 2000/- V¡L¡ Cost Hl V¡L¡ Sj¡l j¤m

L¢f c¡¢Mm L−lez e¢b B−c−nl SeÉ ®fn Ll¡ q−m¡z

ö¢em¡jz ¢hh¡c£ f−rl c¡¢Mm£ pj−ul clM¡Ù¹ J e¢b fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡ L¢lm¡jz e¢b fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡u ®cM¡ k¡u ®k, 1, 2, 5 J

6 ew ¢hh¡c£fr Na 25-10-2022 Cw a¡¢l−M ea¥e JL¡mae¡j¡−k¡−N Bc¡m−a q¡¢Sl qCu¡ Sh¡h c¡¢M−ml SeÉ pj−ul fÊ¡bÑe¡ L¢l−mJ AcÉ¡h¢c Eš² ¢hh¡c£fr ¢m¢Ma Sh¡h c¡¢Mm L−l e¡Cz AbÑ GZ Bc¡ma BCe, 2003 HL¢V ¢h−no BCez Eš² BC−el 10(1) d¡l¡l ¢hd¡e j−a ¢edÑ¡¢la pju

p£j¡ C−a¡j−dÉ A¢ah¡¢qa qJu¡u ¢hh¡c£ f−rl AcÉL¡l c¡¢Mm£ pj−ul clM¡Ù¹ ¢h−hQe¡ Ll¡l BCeNa p¤−k¡N ®eCz Hja¡hÙÛ¡u 1, 2, 5 J 6 ew ¢hh¡c£f−rl c¡¢Mm£ pj−ul clM¡Ù¹ e¡j‘¤l Ll¡ qCmz

Aaxfl e¢b öe¡e£A−¿¹ HLalg¡ B−c−nl SeÉ

®eJu¡ qCmz

e¢b fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡u ®cM¡ k¡u ®k, Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡l ¢hh¡c£−cl ¢hl¦−Ü Bc¡ma J X¡L ®k¡−N pje Cpɤ Ll¡ qCu¡−Rz f¡n¡f¡¢n ¢hh¡c£−cl e¡j£u pje ®~~c¢eL f¢œL¡l j¡dÉ−j S¡l£ Ll¡ qCu¡−Rz AbÑ GZ Bc¡ma BCe, 2003 Hl

7(1) d¡l¡l ¢hd¡e −j¡a¡−hL pje Cpɤl 15 ¢ch−pl j−dÉ

S¡l£ qCu¡ ®gla e¡ B¢p−m ¢Lwh¡ avf§−hÑ ¢he¡ S¡l£−a ®gla B¢p−m Eq¡l flhaÑ£ 15 ¢ch−pl j−dÉ h¡wm¡ S¡a£u ®~~c¢eL f¢œL¡l j¡dÉ−j pje S¡l£l ¢h‘¢ç fËL¡n Ll¡ qC−m a¡q¡ BCe¡e¤N S¡l£ j−jÑ NZÉ−k¡NÉz ¢hh¡c£−cl fË¢a pje ¢h‘¢ç BCe¡e¤N S¡l£ NZÉ qCu¡−Rz

E−õMÉ ®k, AbÑ GZ Bc¡ma BCe, 2003 Hl 6(4)

d¡l¡l ¢hd¡e ®j¡a¡−hL h¡c£fr H¢g−X¢hVpq Bl¢S c¡¢Mm Llax a¡q¡l p¡−b pw¢nÔø fËj¡efœ c¡¢Mmf§hÑL ®j¡LŸj¡ c¡−ul L¢l−m ®j¡LŸj¡l HLalg¡ h¡ a¡vr¢eL ¢eÖf¢šl

®r−œ ®L¡e p¡r£−L fl£r¡ hÉ¢a−l−L qmge¡j¡k¤š² Bl¢S,

pw¢nÔø c¡¢m¢mL fËj¡e¡¢c ¢h−nÔoef§hÑL l¡u h¡ B−cn fËc¡e omission or malepulation the meaning of Ll¡ k¡uz Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡l h¡c£fr Bl¢Sl p¢qa qmge¡j¡ the order has been changed.

c¡¢Mm L¢lu¡−Re k¡q¡ Eš² BC−el 6(4) d¡l¡u However, on scrutiny, it appears that Substantive evidence h¡ ®j±¢mL p¡rÉ ¢q−p−h NeÉ

at least three people or official working in qC−hz

the section were involved in preparing or −lLXÑ fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡u ®cM¡ k¡u ®k, h¡c£fr ¢hNa 18-

06-2022 Cw a¡¢lM fkÑ¿¹ 121,03,19,097.85 (HLna supplying such manipulated or fake certified HL¥n ®L¡¢V ¢ae mr E¢eL q¡S¡l p¡a¡eîC