Present:-

Mr. Justice Mahmudul Hoque

Civil Revision No. 663 of 2015 Hajee Md. Azad Khan

... Petitioner -Versus-

Md. Abdul Hannan being dead his heirs; 1(a) Khodeza Begum and others

...Opposite-parties Mr. Taufiq Anwar Chowdhury with

Ms. Monoara Belgum, Advocates

...For the petitioner Mr. Humayun Kabir with

Ms. Tasmin Akter, Advocate

...For the opposite-party Nos. 5 and 6.

Heard on 23.05.2024, 27.05.24, 28.05.2024 and Judgment on 29th May, 2024.

In this application under Section 115(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, by granting leave to revision to the petitioner, Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party No. 1 to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order dated 04.09.2014 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Brahmanbaria in Civil Revision No. 17 of 2013 allowing the same and thereby reversing the judgment and order dated 02.07.2012 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Brahmanbaria in Title Suit No. 304 of 2009 rejecting the application for rejection of plaint and directing the plaintiff to deposit the deficit balance consideration of the contract by 15.05.2013 should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further order or