SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 14650

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION

(CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION)

Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Moinul Islam Chowdhury

Civil Revision No. 3012 of 2002

Naya Mia Sikder and another

--- The defendant Nos.2 and 3 respondent- petitioners

=Versus=

1(ka) A. Rahim and others

--- The defendant No.1 opposite-parties

Mr. Sabya Sachi Mondal, Advocate

----- For the petitioners. Mr. Md. Shahidul Islam with

Mr. M. Riaz Hossain Sikder and

Ms. Naharin Begum, Advocates

----- For the opposite-parties.

Heard on 02.02.2017 and Judgment on 06.03.2017

At the instance of the present defendant Nos.2 & 3-respondent- petitioners, Naya Mia Sikder and another, this Rule has been issued calling upon the opposite-party Nos. 1(ka)-7 to show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 28.04.2002 passed by the Joint District Judge, 2nd Court, Jhalakati in Title Appeal No.111 of 1993 reversing the judgment and decree dated 01.08.1993 passed in Title Suit No.92 of 1990 by the Assistant Judge, Nalchity should not be set aside.

The relevant facts for disposal of the Rule, inter alia, are that the present opposite-party Nos.1-7 as the plaintiffs filed the Title Suit No.92


Page # 1

of 1999 in the Cour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top