IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION
(CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
Present:
Mr. Justice S M Kuddus Zaman CIVIL REVISION NO.4154 of 2005. In the matter of:
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
And
Sreemoti Momota Rani (Mukul) and others
...Petitioners -Versus-
Sreemati Narayani Kunda and others
...opposite parties
Mr. Md. Garib Newaj, Senior Advocate with Ms. Maksuda Akhter, Advocate
...For the petitioners No one appears
...For the opposite parties
Heard & Judgment on 29.08.2024.
This rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos.1-6 to show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 11.09.2005 and 18.09.2005 respectively passed in Partition Appeal NO.06 of 2005 by the learned District Judge, Joypurhat reversing the judgment and decree dated 27.11.2000 and 29.11.2000 respectively passed by Sub-ordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Joypurhat in Suit No.18 of 1999 partition should not be set aside and/or pass such
1
other order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.
Facts in short are that petitioner as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No.18 of 1999 for partition seeking a separate saham for 92 d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.