SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 13877

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH

HIGH COURT DIVISION

(CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION)

CIVIL REVISION No. 1476 OF 2018.

Md. Nazrul Islam and others.

...Petitioners.

-Versus-

Amorendra Narayan and others.

....Opposite parties. Mr. Saidul Alam Khan, Advocate

For the petitioners

Mr. Surojit Bhattacharjee with

Mrs. Farhana Siraj Roonic with

Mr. Monishankar Sarkar, Advocates

for the opposite party Nos. 1(a)-1(c)

Heard on: 23.11.2023,14.12.2023,19.02.2024.

Judgement on: 20.02.2024.

Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Badruzzaman.

This Rule was issued calling upon opposite party Nos. 1-4 to show cause as to why judgment and decree dated 29.03.2018 passed by learned Assistant Judge, Babugonj, Barishal in Title Suit No. 40 of 2008 decreeing the suit should not be set aside.

At the time of issuance of Rule the operation of the impugned judgment and decree was stayed for a period of 6 (six) months which was, subsequently, extended till disposal of the Rule.

Facts relevant, for the purpose of disposal of this Rule, are that opposite party Nos. 1-4 as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 40 of 2008 under section 9 of the Specific Relief Act in the Court of Assistant Judge, Babugonj, B

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top