Present:
Mr. Justice A.K.M. Asaduzzaman
Civil Revision No. 1255 of 2024
Kazi Riazul Islam and others
………… Petitioners.
-Versus-
Atahar Ali Kazi and others
………….Opposite parties. Mr. Sikder Mahmdur Razi, Adv. with
Mr. Ashoke Kumar Paul, Advocate
.........For the petitioners.
Mrs. Anjuman Ara, Advocate
......... For the opposite parties.
Heard and judgment on 12th June, 2024. A.K.M.Asaduzzaman,J.
This rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 20.02.2024 passed by the District Judge-in-charge, Pirojpur in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 31 of 2023 reversing those dated 19.11.2023 passed by the Assistant Judge, Bhandaria, Pirojpur in Title Suit No. 172 of 2023 directing the parties to maintain status quo in respect of
1
possession and position of the suit property till hearing of the application for temporary injunction should not be set aside.
Petitioners as plaintiffs filed Title Suit No. 172 of 2023 before the Court of Assistant Judge, Bhandaria, Pirojpur against the petitioners and others for partition.
During pendency of the suit, on 01.10.2023 plaintiff petitioner filed an application for temporary injunction and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.