Present:

Mr.Justice S M Kuddus Zaman CIVIL REVISION NO.2976 of 2005.

1 (Ka)(i) Most. Shamima Akter and others

...Petitioners -Versus-

1(a) Mst. Umme Salma and others ...opposite parties

Mr. Shasti Sarker, Advocates

...For the petitioners

Mr. Md. Helal Uddin Mollah, Advocate ...For the opposite parties

Heard on 22.08.2024 & Judgment on 25.08.2024.

This rule was issued calling upon the opposite party No.1 to show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 11.05.2005 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Kurigram in Other Class Appeal No.94 of 2002 dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment and decree dated 11.06.2002 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, 1st Court, Kurigram in Other Class Suit No.08 of 1998 should not be set aside and/or pass such other order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.

Facts in short are that the opposite party as plaintiff instituted above suit for declaration that the auction sale of the disputed decimal land pursuant to the execution of the

decree of Rent Suit No.719 of 1959 was unlawful and not binding upon the plaintiffs and for a decree of partition.

The plaintiffs claim title in the dispu