SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 13728

In the Supreme Court of Bangladesh High Court Division

(Civil Revisional Jurisdiction)

Present:

Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdul Hafiz Civil Revision No. 1145 of 2003

Ali Farid Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner

-Versus-

Md. Harun Rashid (Matawalli) and others Plaintiffs-Appellants-Opposite Parties

Mr. Sudipta Arjun, Advocate for the Petitioner

Mr. Abdul Barek Chowdhury, Advocate with

Mr. Md. Alamgir Kabir, Advocate Mr. Md. Sharif Uddin Ratan, Advocate for the Opposite Party No. 1

with

Civil Revision No. 304 of 2021

Ali Farid

Defendant No. 1-Appellant-Petitioner

-Versus-

Jhalopara Jame Masjid and others Plaintiffs-Respondents-Opposite Parties

Mr. Sudipta Arjun, Advocate for the Petitioner

Mr. Abdul Barek Chowdhury, Advocate with

Mr. Md. Alamgir Kabir, Advocate Mr. Md. Sharif Uddin Ratan, Advocate for the Opposite Parties

Judgment on: 14.3.2023


1

These two Rule have been arisen out of the same Judgment and Decree and were heard analogously and thus both the revisions are to be disposed of by one Judgment.

In Civil Revision No. 1145 of 2003 Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos. 1-6 to show cause as to why the impugned Judgment and Decree dated 14.10.2002 passed by the learn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top