Bench:

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty

[

Civil Revision No.3958 of 2018

Md. Mukhles Miah ......petitioner

-Versus-

Abdul Kadir being dead his heirs:

1(Ka) Shahat Ali others

......opposite parties

Mr. Mohammad Abul Kashem Bhuiyan,

Advocate ...... for the petitioner

Mr. Ali Ahsan Mullah, Advocate

...... for opposite parties 1(Ka),1(Kha), 1(Uma), 1(Cha), 1(Chha) and 2

Judgment on 30.05.2024

This Rule at the instance of defendant 2 was issued calling upon plaintiff-opposite parties 1(Ka) to 1(Chha) and 2 to show cause as to why the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge (in- charge), Court No.1, Brahmanbaria passed on 28.10.2018 in Title Appeal No.44 of 2017 dismissing the appeal affirming the order and final decree of the Senior Assistant Judge, Nasirnagor, Brahmanbaria passed on 13.02.2017 and 20.02.2017 respectively in Title Suit No.55 of 2000 (partition) rejecting the petitioner’s objection against the Advocate Commissioner’s Report and drawing up final decree in the suit should not be set aside and and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this Court may seem fit and proper.

At the time of issuing the Rule all further proceedings of Executio