IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION

(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

Writ Petition No. 12744 of 2023. In the matter of:

An application under article 102 (2) of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.

-And- In the matter of: AKM Shamsuddoha.

...... Petitioner

-Versus-

Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka and others.

. . . Respondents.

Mr. Md. Asaduzzaman with

Ms. Tasnuva Shelly, Advocate

. . . For the petitioner.

Mr. Sikder Mahmudur Razi, Advocate

. . For the respondent No.2.

Present:

Mr. Justice J. B. M. Hassan and

Mr. Justice Razik Al Jalil

Heard and Judgment on 30.11.2023.

J. B. M. Hassan, J.

The petitioner obtained the Rule Nisi in the following terms:

“Let a Rule Nisi be issued calling upon the respondents No. 1 and 2 to show cause as to why the order No. 59 dated 01.10.2023 passed by the learned Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka in Artha Rin Case No. 3130 of 2015 rejecting the adjournment application filed by the petitioner for submitting specimen signature and thereby fixing the date of judgment (Annexure-A to the writ petition) should not be declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect And as to why the responden