Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Salim

CIVIL REVISION NO.163 OF 1997

IN THE MATTER OF:

Mr. Nazmul Afaq

............ Plaintiff-Petitioner. -Versus-

Taher Uddin alias Abu Mia and others

......... Opposite Parties. Mr. Syed Abdur Rahim, Advocate

..... For the petitioner. Mr. Md. Zahedul Bari, Advocate

---- For the opposite parties. The 31st October,2024

MD. SALIM, J:

By this Rule, the opposite parties were called upon to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated 15.05.1996 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 3rd Court, Kishoreganj in Other Appeal No.113 of 1994 allowing the appeal and reversing the judgment and decree dated 24.02.1994 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Nikli, Kishoreganj in Partition Suit No.9 of 1992 decreeing the suit in part.

Facts in a nutshell for disposal of the Rule are that the plaintiffs-opposite parties filed Partition Suit No.9 of 1992 before the Assistant Judge, Nikli, Kishoreganj, for partition of immovable properties described in the schedule of the plaint of the suit.

Defendants 5, 6, and 11-24 contested the suit by filing separate written statements denying the material allegations of the plaint.