1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH
HIGH COURT DIVISION
(CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION)
Present:
Mr. Justice Md. Badruzzaman.
Civil Revision No. 605 of 2008.
Taj Mohammad and others
...Petitioners.
-Versus-
Alta Miah and others
....Opposite parties. Ms. Urmee Rahman, Advocate with
Mr. Tabarak Hussain, Advocate.
...For the petitioners. Mr. Md. Khaled Ahmed, Advocate with Mr. Md. Habibur Rahman, Advocate.
...For opposite party No. 8
Heard on: 23.11.23, 13.12.2023 and 19.02.2024.
Judgment on: 20.02.2024.
This Rule was issued calling upon opposite parties No. 1-9 to show cause as to why judgment and decree dated 04.10.2007 passed by Joint District Judge, 2nd Court, Moulavibazar in Title Appeal No. 33 of 2002 analogously with Cross Objection No. 1 of 2002 dismissing the appeal and Cross-objection by affirming judgment and decree dated 20.02.2002 passed by learned Assistant Judge, Rajnagar, Moulvibazar in Title Suit No. 2 of 1997 dismissing the suit should not be set aside.
Facts relevant, for the purpose of disposal of this Rule, are that the father of petitioner Nos. 1-8 and petitioner No. 9 as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 2 of 1997 against the opposite parties for a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.