SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 13852

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH

HIGH COURT DIVISION

(CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION)

Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Badruzzaman.

Civil Revision No. 605 of 2008.

Taj Mohammad and others

...Petitioners.

-Versus-

Alta Miah and others

....Opposite parties. Ms. Urmee Rahman, Advocate with

Mr. Tabarak Hussain, Advocate.

...For the petitioners. Mr. Md. Khaled Ahmed, Advocate with Mr. Md. Habibur Rahman, Advocate.

...For opposite party No. 8

Heard on: 23.11.23, 13.12.2023 and 19.02.2024.

Judgment on: 20.02.2024.

This Rule was issued calling upon opposite parties No. 1-9 to show cause as to why judgment and decree dated 04.10.2007 passed by Joint District Judge, 2nd Court, Moulavibazar in Title Appeal No. 33 of 2002 analogously with Cross Objection No. 1 of 2002 dismissing the appeal and Cross-objection by affirming judgment and decree dated 20.02.2002 passed by learned Assistant Judge, Rajnagar, Moulvibazar in Title Suit No. 2 of 1997 dismissing the suit should not be set aside.

Facts relevant, for the purpose of disposal of this Rule, are that the father of petitioner Nos. 1-8 and petitioner No. 9 as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 2 of 1997 against the opposite parties for a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top