Bench:
Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty
Civil Revision No.1066 of 2023
Mamtaz Begom and others ......petitioners -Versus-
Sanoara Begum and others
......opposite parties
Mr. Ruhul Amin, Advocate
...... for the petitioners Mr. Md. Mubarak Hossain, Advocate
...... for opposite parties 1-5, 7 and 14
Judgment on 30.07.2024
The leave was granted and Rule was issued calling upon opposite parties 1-14 to show cause as to why the judgment and order of the Additional District Judge, Court No.2, Cumilla passed on 31.10.2022 in Civil Revision No.10 of 2021 allowing the revision thereby reversing the order of the Assistant Judge, Debidwar, Cumilla passed on 27.01.2021 in Miscellaneous Case No.04 of 2017 rejecting the application under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (the Code) shall not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this Court seem fit and proper.
The material facts for disposal of the Rule, in brief, are that the opposite parties herein as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No.27 of 1987 against the present petitioners and others praying for partition of the suit land as detailed in the schedule to the plaint. Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.