SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 12072

Bench:

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty

Civil Revision No.1066 of 2023

Mamtaz Begom and others ......petitioners -Versus-

Sanoara Begum and others

......opposite parties

Mr. Ruhul Amin, Advocate

...... for the petitioners Mr. Md. Mubarak Hossain, Advocate

...... for opposite parties 1-5, 7 and 14

Judgment on 30.07.2024

The leave was granted and Rule was issued calling upon opposite parties 1-14 to show cause as to why the judgment and order of the Additional District Judge, Court No.2, Cumilla passed on 31.10.2022 in Civil Revision No.10 of 2021 allowing the revision thereby reversing the order of the Assistant Judge, Debidwar, Cumilla passed on 27.01.2021 in Miscellaneous Case No.04 of 2017 rejecting the application under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (the Code) shall not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this Court seem fit and proper.

The material facts for disposal of the Rule, in brief, are that the opposite parties herein as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No.27 of 1987 against the present petitioners and others praying for partition of the suit land as detailed in the schedule to the plaint. Th


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top