Present:

Mr.Justice S M Kuddus Zaman

CIVIL REVISION NO.2829 of 2006. Md. Montaj Sarkar

.....Petitioner

-Versus-

Most. Oaresa Khatoon and others ...opposite parties

Mr. Hassan Shaheed Kamruzzaman, Advocate

...For the petitioner No one appears

...For the opposite parties

Heard & Judgment on:24.01.2024.

This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos.1-3 to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 20.02.2006 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, 2nd Court, Pabna in Miscellaneous Appeal No.46 of 2004 reversing those dated 21.07.2004 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Chatmohor, Pabna in Miscellaneous Case No.09 of 1999 should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper.

Facts in short are that the petitioner as petitioner filed above Miscellaneous Case under section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act for pre-emption of the land of transferred by registered deed of Hiba bil iwaz dated 11.01.1999 which was executed by opposite party Nos.1-3 in favour of opposite party No.4. Above document was in fact a deed of sale but the same was falsely designated as a deed of Hiba bil