Bench:

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty

Civil Revision No. 6147 of 2022

Halim Sheikh and others ..... petitioners -Versus-

Begum Hamida Banu and others

..... opposite parties

Mr. Abul Kalam Azad, Advocate

..... for the petitioners

Mr. Purnindu Bikash Das with Mr.. Ripon Barai and

Mr. Sanjoy Mandal, Advocates

..... for the opposite parties

Judgment on 30.05.2024

Bhishmadev Chakrabortty, J:

This rule was issued calling upon opposite party 1 to show cause as to why the judgment and order of the Joint District Judge, 2nd Court, Satkhira passed on 30.08.2022 in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 14 of 2022 dismissing the appeal affirming the judgment and order of the Assistant Judge, Shyamnagar, Satkhira passed on 08.02.2022 in Title Suit No. 05 of 2021 allowing the application for temporary injunction should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this Court may seem fit and proper.

Facts relevant for disposal of the rule, in brief, are that opposite party 1 herein as plaintiff instituted the suit praying for permanent injunction in respect of the land as described in schedule to the plaint. In the said suit he filed an application under Order 39 rule 1 an