SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 12870

1

Present:-

Mr. Justice Mahmudul Hoque

Civil Revision No. 3647 of 1996 Nur Ahmed and others

... Petitioners -Versus-

Abdur Rahman being dead his legal heirs: 1(a) Mallica Begum and others

...Opposite-Parties

Mr. Mohammad Al-Amin, Advocate

...For the Petitioners Ms. Quamrun Nessa, Advocate

...For the Opposite-Party Nos. 2-5.

Judgment on 31st October, 2024.

On an application under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure this Rule was issued at the instance of the petitioners calling upon the opposite party Nos.1-6 to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated 21.05.1996 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge) and Commercial Court and Artha Rin Adalat, Chattogram in Other Appeal No. 419 of 1994 disallowing the appeal and thereby affirming the judgment and decree dated 27.08.1994 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Chandanaish, Chattogram in Title Suit No. 59 of 1985 decreeing the suit should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.

Shorn of unnecessary details, fact of the case lies in a very narrow compus. The opposite party Nos. 1-






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top