Present:
Mr. Justice A.K.M. Asaduzzaman
Civil Revision No. 3608 of 2002
Md. Abdul Mannan being dead his legal heirs 1(a) Md. Mehedi Hassan Tornedo and others
………… Petitioners. -Versus-
Md. Abdul Hossain being dead his legal heirs 1(a) Md. Afzal and others
……….Opposite parties.
Mr. Md. Ishaque Miah, Advocate
………For the petitioners.
Mr. Md. Abdullah Al Mamun, Advocate .........For the Opposite parties
Heard and judgment on 2nd July, 2024. A.K.M.Asaduzzaman,J.
This rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2002 passed by the Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Pabna in Other Class Appeal No. 10 of 2000 reversing those dated 30.01.2000
1
passed by the then Subordinate Judge, 1st Court, Pabna in Other Class Suit No. 23 of 1990 dismissing the suit should not be set aside.
Opposite party as plaintiff filed Other Class Suit No. 23 of 1990 before the Court of the then Subordinate Judge, 1st Court, Pabna for declaration of title and further declaration that khatian No. 49 in place of khatian No.45 has wrongly been written in the deed dated 26.04.69 and 19.10.73.
Plaint case in short, inter alia, is that the sched
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.