SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 8560

Present:

Mr. Justice A.K.M. Asaduzzaman

Civil Revision No. 3608 of 2002

Md. Abdul Mannan being dead his legal heirs 1(a) Md. Mehedi Hassan Tornedo and others

………… Petitioners. -Versus-

Md. Abdul Hossain being dead his legal heirs 1(a) Md. Afzal and others

……….Opposite parties.

Mr. Md. Ishaque Miah, Advocate

………For the petitioners.

Mr. Md. Abdullah Al Mamun, Advocate .........For the Opposite parties

Heard and judgment on 2nd July, 2024. A.K.M.Asaduzzaman,J.

This rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2002 passed by the Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Pabna in Other Class Appeal No. 10 of 2000 reversing those dated 30.01.2000


1

passed by the then Subordinate Judge, 1st Court, Pabna in Other Class Suit No. 23 of 1990 dismissing the suit should not be set aside.

Opposite party as plaintiff filed Other Class Suit No. 23 of 1990 before the Court of the then Subordinate Judge, 1st Court, Pabna for declaration of title and further declaration that khatian No. 49 in place of khatian No.45 has wrongly been written in the deed dated 26.04.69 and 19.10.73.

Plaint case in short, inter alia, is that the sched




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top