Present:

Mr. Justice A.K.M. Asaduzzaman

Civil Revision No. 5200 of 2022

Md. Golam Mostofa and others

………… Petitioners. -Versus-

Abdul Haque and others

……….Opposite parties.

Mr. Abul Kashem Bhuiya, Adv. with. Mr. Kawsar Mahmud, Advocate

………For the petitioners.

Mr. Syed Mahmudul Ahsan, Adv.

Mr. Mohammad Shahidul Islam, Adv.

.........For the Opposite parties

Heard on 13th December, 2023

Judgment on 9th June, 2024. A.K.M.Asaduzzaman,J.

This rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 19.09.2022 passed

by the Additional District Judge, Pirojpur in Title Appeal No. 94 of 2014 allowing the appeal after setting aside the judgment and decree dated 10.08.2014 passed by the Assistant Judge, Mathbaria, Pirojpur in Title Suit No. 123 of 1999 decreeing the suit in part should not be set aside.

Petitioner as plaintiff filed the above suit initially for partition subsequently by way of amendment he prayed for declaration of title and for partition against the opposite parties.

Plaint case in short, inter alia, is that the land in question as described in schedule ‘ka’ of the district Pirojpur, Upazila- Mathbaria, Porgona_Sayedpu