SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 14217

1

Present:-

Mr. Justice Mahmudul Hoque

Civil Revision No. 770 of 2013

Abdul Salam and others

... Petitioners -Versus-

People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by Additional Deputy Commissioner (ADC) (Revenue), Narsingdi and others

...Opposite-parties Mr. Rafiqul Islam Sohel, Advocate

...For the petitioners

Mr. Apurba Kumar Bhattacharjee, DAG with

Mr. Md. Kamal Haider, AAG and

Mr. Md. Faruk Hossain, AAG

...For the opposite-parties-Government.

Heard on 18.02.24, 20.02.2024 and Judgment on 22nd February, 2024.

In this application under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, this Rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated 27.08.2012 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, 1st Court, Narsingdi in Title Appeal No. 84 of 2003 allowing the appeal and setting aside the judgment and decree dated 07.07.2002 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Belabo, Narsingdi in Title Suit No. 14 of 2001 decreeing the suit should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.

Shorn of unnecessary details, fact of the case lies in a very narrow compus. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top