SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 8834

Present:

Mr. Justice A.K.M. Asaduzzaman

Civil Revision No.3896 of 2012

Abul Kalam being dead his legal heirs Chan Banu and others.

……………Petitioners.

-Versus-

Government of Bangladesh and others. ………….Opposite parties.

Mr.Mohammad Eunus, Adv. With

Mr. Md. Jahangir Alam, Advocate.

……….For the petitioners. Mr. Md. Ensan Uddin Sheikh, D.A.G

With Mr. Md. Bulbul Haque

Chowdhury, Advocate. With

Mr. Mahmud Hasan, Adv.

.........For the Opposite parties.

Heard on 09.05.2024 and

Judgment on 13.05.2024. A.K.M.Asaduzzaman,J.

This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party nos. 1-

28 to show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2012 passed by the Additional District Judge, Chapainawabgonj in Title Appeal No. 237 of 2007 affirming those dated 13.08.2007 passed by the Joint District Judge, 2nd Court,


1

Chapainawabgonj in Other Class Suit No. 11 of 2001 should not be set aside.

Opposite party no. 1 government as plaintiff filed the suit being Other Class Suit No. 11 of 2001 before the Court of Joint District Judge, 2nd Court, Chapainawabgonj against the petitioners for declaration of title in the suit land in respect of 47.14 acres of land as described in the sche


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top