SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 8514

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION

(CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISIDICTION)

Present:

Mr. Justice S M Kuddus Zaman

And

Mr. Justice A.K.M. Rabiul Hassan

Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 12235 of 2024

Mohammad Jahangir Alam

.... Accused-Petitioner -Versus-

The State

…. Opposite Party Mr. Md. Miraj Uddin, Advocate

…. For the petitioner. Mr. Sujit Chatterjee, D.A.G. with

Mr. Moududa Begum, A.A.G.

Mr. Mirza Md. Soyeb Muhit, A.A.G. Mr. Mohammad Selim, A.A.G.

Mr. Zahid Ahmed (Hero), A.A.G.

.… For the State. Heard and Judgment on 11.07.2024.

S M Kuddus Zaman, J:

On an application under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure this Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the proceedings of Sessions Case No.1621 of 2022 arising out of C.R. Case No.195 of 2021 (Fatikchahari) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, now pending in the Court of learned Joint Session Judge, 3rd Court, Chattogram should not be quashed


1

and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.

Facts in short are that the opposite party complainant filed above case through his constituted attorney under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top